97 % of new or updated products have an improved environmental and social profile in 2022.
(1) Basis of calculation representing 72% of all projects, excluding items considered to be irrelevant, such as ad hoc animation and promotion products and regulatory compliance leading to changes that are not visible to consumers.
In 1995, L’Oréal opened its first environmental research laboratory to evaluate and reduce the environmental footprint of its formulas. Through this initiative, the Group has developed expertise with regard to the potential impacts of its cosmetic products on aquatic environments. Right from the design stage, raw materials used in the formulation of products are evaluated as part of a strict ingredient selection process. Since 2005, L’Oréal has abstained from registering new raw materials with an adverse environmental profile (see section 4.3.1.3.1 B and C).
Packaging represents a significant part of the environmental impact of cosmetic products. Reducing the environmental footprint of packaging is therefore naturally part of the commitments under the L’Oréal for the Future programme (1). In 2007, L’Oréal launched a Packaging and Environment Policy that incorporates respect for consumers, the environment and biodiversity.
The new programme highlights three major challenges to improving the environmental profile of packaging: resource optimisation, the choice of materials and circularity after product use (see section 4.3.1.3.1. C).
For several years, L’Oréal has carried out Lice Cycle Analysis of the life cycles of its products in order to identify, evaluate and improve their environmental impact.
Since 2017, SPOT (2), based on a rigorous scientific methodology for assessing environmental impacts, has been rolled out to all Group brands (except recent acquisitions). This tool calculates the environmental and social footprints of a product in accordance with the European Commission recommendation(3). SPOT is an important part of L'Oreal's product launch processes, putting sustainable innovation at the very heart of product development.
SPOT also includes a methodology for measuring the social impact of products. It was jointly developed with internal expertise (formula, packaging, factory, stakeholders) and eleven international experts in environmental and social lifecycle analyses (5).
All products manufactured by the Group are analysed, from shampoos and haircare products to hair dyes and perfumes. This analysis enables products with the same consumer benefit to be classified according to their environmental footprint.
150 product categories that provide a consumer benefit were defined and over 40,000 formulas were screened. Then, the performance of each category was established to allow for the eco-design of products using SPOT. The aim is to ensure that new formulas are developed with the goal of obtaining an improved environmental profile while maintaining the same benefits for the consumer.
In 2022, 49% of created or renovated products had an improved environmental profile due to a new formula with a smaller environmental footprint.
The Group is working to measure and increase the biodegradability of its formulas and reduce their water footprint at the end of their life cycle. These two parameters have been integrated in the SPOT product eco-design tool.
All product formulator teams use this tool to assess biodegradability and water footprint whenever new formulas are created.
In 2022, 100% of formulas put into production for the first time were evaluated and 80% of these have an improved environmental profile.
Among the new products launched in 2022, those listed below have formulas with biodegradability levels of over 98%(all L’Oréal geographic Zones):
(1) Following on from the former Sharing Beauty With All programme, which came to an end in 2020.
(2) Sustainable Product Optimisation Tool.
(3) Recommendation on the use of common methods to measure and communicate the environmental performance of products and organisations (Product Environmental Footprint).
(4) Boundaries developed by an international team led by Professor Johan Rockström of the Stockholm Resilience Centre.
(5) See section 4.3.1.2.2.